Photobucket
Kim. 24. Mexican. BA in Psychology. Taken by my incredible Girlfriend. Promised my girlfriend I'd follow her across the world, and I did. Currently living in Brisbane, Australia after trekking all the way from South Florida, USA. Proud Bat Rescuer
Sports obsessed:
- Atlanta Braves
- Miami Dolphins
- Miami Heat
- Brisbane Broncos
- Queensland Maroons
- Real Madrid
- Socceroos
Fandoms:
- SuperWhoLocked
- Harry Potter
- Glee
- Grey's Anatomy
- Modern Family
- True Blood
- Hunger Games
- Orange Is The New Black
The Girlfriend & I:
Photobucketwww.grandmasunderpants.tumblr.com [Just remember, she is ALL mine]

Daisypath Anniversary tickers

29th July 2014

Post with 7 notes

Found out today that the bat I rescued the other day (Dusty, the female black flying fox) is indeed pregnant! I can’t wait to see her and spoil her with fruit xx

Tagged: rescue lifeworth itbatsbatty

29th July 2014

Photoset reblogged from Nihil sub sole novum. with 11,653 notes

Pedro, Gwendoline and Nikolaj at San Diego Comic Con 2014 (x)

Source: rubyredwisp

29th July 2014

Post reblogged from A Tan mom appreciation blog with 175,658 notes

"Faggot"

sueishappy:

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

Source: sueishappy

29th July 2014

Photo reblogged from The Queen is not Amused...but I am. with 26,909 notes

Source: ForGIFs.com

29th July 2014

Photoset reblogged from You Know Nothing, Jon Snow. with 327,318 notes

didyourmomjustcallmeababydyke:

consultingmoosecaptain:

heartsmadeoutofstrings:

Remember all the times that your heart was ripped from your chest?

Disney movies (and others like it) taught us how to love, how to cherish life and how powerful death can be. At a young age, these were very important lessons.

YOU MOTHERFUCKER TOY STORY THREE CAME OUT WHEN I WAS 18 AND I BALWED LIKE A BABY YOUNG AGE MY FOOT

FUCK THIS.

Source: heartsmadeoutofstrings

29th July 2014

Photo reblogged from You Know Nothing, Jon Snow. with 376,165 notes

elysiumcastiel:

theatricalpopculture:

chihuahuawho:

miakosamuio:

mishastolemywormstache:

sandandglass:

CNN actually researched how much it would cost to go to Hogwarts

#NO WONDER THE WEASLEYS ARE FUCKING BROKE

How exactly did they “research” this? Looks like they just pulled a bunch of random figures out of their butts.
It’s stated in the books that tuition to Hogwarts is “free for all children in Britain”. I don’t know why they thought it wouldn’t be - it’s a British high school, not a college. So there, you just saved yourself $42,024.
In Chamber of Secrets, Mrs. Weasley emptied her entire bank account which contained only two galleons [£10 / US$20] and she managed to buy all five children’s entire set of books and potion ingredients with this, as well as Ginny’s robes, hat, clock, cauldron, and wand!!! And we know she bought all of these as she mentioned having to buy them. The fact that she bought all of these with only £10 pretty much proves how absolutely ridiculous CNNs estimation is.
If you want more proof, the actual cost of Harry’s want is far over estimated here, and the exact price in both pounds as US dollars can easily be found right within the books! Harry’s wand is bought for seven galleons, a galleon being worth about five pounds [mentioned by JK Rowling in an interview and in FBAWTFT/QTTA] means that his wand was £35, or US$53. So there’s some straight-out-of-the-books-and-word-of-god proof that the figures CNN have given are way off the mark. Not to mention the fact that even if you don’t go to Hogwarts, as a magical human you’re gonna have to buy a wand anyway if you want to do magic.
As for the school books, I’ve done an approximation based on various prices given through-out the books and on Pottermore. While these prices involve a substantial amount of guess-work, I think you’ll agree that my calculation is far more accurate than CNNs:
The Standard book of Spells costs one sickle [29p / US59c]. On the back of my comic relief copy of Fantastic Beasts and Where To Find Them it says it costs fourteen sickles [£4.60 / US$8.26]. One Pottermore, all text books are one galleon [£4.97  / US$10.17] - however Pottermore currency only uses galleons so it’s likely they have rounded off. Lockhart’s books, the most expensive in the series, are five galleons on Pottermore meaning that the exchange rate in the books puts them around two galleons and fourteen sickles [£14.60 / US$20.80]. If we put a high average on this and assume that all textbooks are approximately a galleon [they are likely much less], and that each year has around seven required reading books, the entire price for seven years worth of books would be forty-nine galleons, which equals approximately £243, or US$367 - and remember, this is the maximum estimated price for the textbooks.
For the minimum, we need to consider that the Weasleys get a lot of things second hand, with Ginny’s copy of A Begginers Guide To Transfiguration being described as “a very old, very battered copy” - likely no more than five sickles. If they got all their books around that price, it would cost them no more than £14 / US$21 for the entire seven years worth! So school books, far from being US$516, fall somewhere between US$14 and US$367 for the entire seven years at Hogwarts.
Next we have robe, glove, cloak, and hat prices - these are never mentioned in the books or on Pottermore, so I can’t account for that. However I seriously doubt it’s as a high as they’ve got here. Considering books in the wizarding world are generally much cheaper than in the muggle world, I think it’s fairly safe to assume that clothing is as well. Likely a maximum of a galleon for a single set of robes.
They’ve also forgotten a huge number of things - cauldrons, potion ingredients, scales, and star charts, among others.
So yeah, I really don’t know where they came up with these figures. It looks like some guy just wanted to make a story about how expensive Hogwarts would be and put a bunch of American college figures together and thought “yeah, this looks good.”

The Harry Potter fandom doesn’t fuck around
Get your shit together CNN and stick to current events

THEY’RE SUCH BULLSHITTERS OMG

harry potter fandom telling it how it is

elysiumcastiel:

theatricalpopculture:

chihuahuawho:

miakosamuio:

mishastolemywormstache:

sandandglass:

CNN actually researched how much it would cost to go to Hogwarts

#NO WONDER THE WEASLEYS ARE FUCKING BROKE

How exactly did they “research” this? Looks like they just pulled a bunch of random figures out of their butts.

It’s stated in the books that tuition to Hogwarts is “free for all children in Britain”. I don’t know why they thought it wouldn’t be - it’s a British high school, not a college. So there, you just saved yourself $42,024.

In Chamber of Secrets, Mrs. Weasley emptied her entire bank account which contained only two galleons [£10 / US$20] and she managed to buy all five children’s entire set of books and potion ingredients with this, as well as Ginny’s robes, hat, clock, cauldron, and wand!!! And we know she bought all of these as she mentioned having to buy them. The fact that she bought all of these with only £10 pretty much proves how absolutely ridiculous CNNs estimation is.

If you want more proof, the actual cost of Harry’s want is far over estimated here, and the exact price in both pounds as US dollars can easily be found right within the books! Harry’s wand is bought for seven galleons, a galleon being worth about five pounds [mentioned by JK Rowling in an interview and in FBAWTFT/QTTA] means that his wand was £35, or US$53. So there’s some straight-out-of-the-books-and-word-of-god proof that the figures CNN have given are way off the mark. Not to mention the fact that even if you don’t go to Hogwarts, as a magical human you’re gonna have to buy a wand anyway if you want to do magic.

As for the school books, I’ve done an approximation based on various prices given through-out the books and on Pottermore. While these prices involve a substantial amount of guess-work, I think you’ll agree that my calculation is far more accurate than CNNs:

The Standard book of Spells costs one sickle [29p / US59c]. On the back of my comic relief copy of Fantastic Beasts and Where To Find Them it says it costs fourteen sickles [£4.60 / US$8.26]. One Pottermore, all text books are one galleon [£4.97  / US$10.17] - however Pottermore currency only uses galleons so it’s likely they have rounded off. Lockhart’s books, the most expensive in the series, are five galleons on Pottermore meaning that the exchange rate in the books puts them around two galleons and fourteen sickles [£14.60 / US$20.80]. If we put a high average on this and assume that all textbooks are approximately a galleon [they are likely much less], and that each year has around seven required reading books, the entire price for seven years worth of books would be forty-nine galleons, which equals approximately £243, or US$367 - and remember, this is the maximum estimated price for the textbooks.

For the minimum, we need to consider that the Weasleys get a lot of things second hand, with Ginny’s copy of A Begginers Guide To Transfiguration being described as “a very old, very battered copy” - likely no more than five sickles. If they got all their books around that price, it would cost them no more than £14 / US$21 for the entire seven years worth! So school books, far from being US$516, fall somewhere between US$14 and US$367 for the entire seven years at Hogwarts.

Next we have robe, glove, cloak, and hat prices - these are never mentioned in the books or on Pottermore, so I can’t account for that. However I seriously doubt it’s as a high as they’ve got here. Considering books in the wizarding world are generally much cheaper than in the muggle world, I think it’s fairly safe to assume that clothing is as well. Likely a maximum of a galleon for a single set of robes.

They’ve also forgotten a huge number of things - cauldrons, potion ingredients, scales, and star charts, among others.

So yeah, I really don’t know where they came up with these figures. It looks like some guy just wanted to make a story about how expensive Hogwarts would be and put a bunch of American college figures together and thought “yeah, this looks good.”

The Harry Potter fandom doesn’t fuck around

Get your shit together CNN and stick to current events

THEY’RE SUCH BULLSHITTERS OMG

harry potter fandom telling it how it is

Source: sandandglass

29th July 2014

Photoset reblogged from sie sind das essen und wir sind die jäger with 133,782 notes

elena1981:

barrel—rider:

Expectations Vs. Reality / Game of thrones

Source: barrel--rider

29th July 2014

Photo reblogged from The Queen is not Amused...but I am. with 26,909 notes

Source: ForGIFs.com

29th July 2014

Photo reblogged from oh! you touch my tralala with 581,443 notes

zuriyaa:

churayl:

bloglikeanegyptian:

detectivemerlinwho:

armedforceslove:

fitemehirl:

food-and-sleep:

soldierporn:

 


Bet they don’t look at Palestinian girls like that.

Don’t

be

ignorant


soldiers aren’t monsters. They’re just doing their job

normally i don’t reblog this kind of thing but i have no idea how this utter nonsense got on my dash without some sort of correction and that “don’t be ignorant” post really got to me because it feels like this sort of thing should be common knowledge by now so
don’t 

(x)
be

(x)
ignorant

(x)
here is also a more comprehensive visualisation of palestinian children under israel’s legal regime.
every version of this post should be reblogged with skepticism and corrections. your idiocy begins and ends when you rationalise, justify and misrepresent human suffering by posting cute pictures of soldiers carrying babies - with the caption “don’t be ignorant!” no less. this kind of mentality should not be mainstream, and you shouldn’t be okay with reblogging it. some soldiers are monstrous, because they’re doing monstrous work. any defense of it is unnecessary. your normalisation of a soldier’s work is acceptance of tyranny. it should be recognised when the orders they’re following are abhorrent. 

Also, recall that time Israeli children were signing missiles during the 2006 war with Lebanon. If the above picture shows anything, it shows that IDF corrupts and indoctrinates children from a young age. these pictures of soldiers with kids they would kill in different circumstances (say if the kid was from the marginalized demographic or not being employed as pro-occupation propaganda) are so old, be it american soldiers in the numerous countries they have military presence in or Israeli soldiers.

Those pictures aren’t even fucking IDF soldiers, they’re American forces in Afghanistan and Iraq (which obviously isn’t any better than what’s pictured above), but the fact that you couldn’t even find pics to prove your asinine point is just……..

zuriyaa:

churayl:

bloglikeanegyptian:

detectivemerlinwho:

armedforceslove:

fitemehirl:

food-and-sleep:

soldierporn:

 

Bet they don’t look at Palestinian girls like that.

Don’t

be

ignorant

soldiers aren’t monsters. They’re just doing their job

normally i don’t reblog this kind of thing but i have no idea how this utter nonsense got on my dash without some sort of correction and that “don’t be ignorant” post really got to me because it feels like this sort of thing should be common knowledge by now so

don’t 

(x)

be

(x)

ignorant

(x)

here is also a more comprehensive visualisation of palestinian children under israel’s legal regime.

every version of this post should be reblogged with skepticism and corrections. your idiocy begins and ends when you rationalise, justify and misrepresent human suffering by posting cute pictures of soldiers carrying babies - with the caption “don’t be ignorant!” no less. this kind of mentality should not be mainstream, and you shouldn’t be okay with reblogging it. some soldiers are monstrous, because they’re doing monstrous work. any defense of it is unnecessary. your normalisation of a soldier’s work is acceptance of tyranny. it should be recognised when the orders they’re following are abhorrent. 

Also, recall that time Israeli children were signing missiles during the 2006 war with Lebanon. If the above picture shows anything, it shows that IDF corrupts and indoctrinates children from a young age. these pictures of soldiers with kids they would kill in different circumstances (say if the kid was from the marginalized demographic or not being employed as pro-occupation propaganda) are so old, be it american soldiers in the numerous countries they have military presence in or Israeli soldiers.

Those pictures aren’t even fucking IDF soldiers, they’re American forces in Afghanistan and Iraq (which obviously isn’t any better than what’s pictured above), but the fact that you couldn’t even find pics to prove your asinine point is just……..

Source: the-few-the-strong

29th July 2014

Post reblogged from Epic Humor - Best Funny Posts on Tumblr with 151,498 notes

black-frostbite:

shubbabang:

I know I’m not the only one who does this but you know when you have this like boundary around you when you’re sitting at a table or a desk that only you are allowed to be in 

image

And then someone or something that isn’t yours

image

gets in that space

image

and you just

image

image

image

image

image

image

Holy fuck finally someone who understands

Source: shubbabang